Difference between revisions of "User:FunnyBoy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Christian Conservatives Consider Third Party Effort) |
(Dream on) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Food for thought: [http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/09/30/christan-conservatives-consider-third-party-effort/ Christian Conservatives Consider Third Party Effort]. | Food for thought: [http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/09/30/christan-conservatives-consider-third-party-effort/ Christian Conservatives Consider Third Party Effort]. | ||
| + | :Unity through fragmentation, just like in the good old days; how many electoral votes do you think a third party can deliver? How many seats in Congress will this third party have? Who are the qualified people to fill the thousands of Presidential appointments -- the people who actually do the hands on running of the government -- some requiring Senate approval which this third party is not likely to control. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Dream on; it's little more than [[subversion]] and [[disinformation]]; and much more importantly, the people who talk such nonsense certainly do not understand a thing about politics or government. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 00:46, 1 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 04:46, October 1, 2007
I am a conservative Point of View Pusher.
Food for thought: Christian Conservatives Consider Third Party Effort.
- Unity through fragmentation, just like in the good old days; how many electoral votes do you think a third party can deliver? How many seats in Congress will this third party have? Who are the qualified people to fill the thousands of Presidential appointments -- the people who actually do the hands on running of the government -- some requiring Senate approval which this third party is not likely to control.
- Dream on; it's little more than subversion and disinformation; and much more importantly, the people who talk such nonsense certainly do not understand a thing about politics or government. Rob Smith 00:46, 1 October 2007 (EDT)