Talk:Augustus Caesar

formatting fix?

Not sure if this is just how IE is viewing it, but the wikitable on the right overlaps text in the first section making it hard to read. Jrssr5 12:39, 4 April 2007 (EDT)

considering this is supposed to be more "americanized" than wikipedia, does it bother anyone that this article is longer than alberto gonzales's, or speaker pelosi's? just a thought...TheisonMarsh

Not at all. An article this long, about one of the most famous of Roman emperors, is entirely appropriate.--TerryH^Talk 23:21, 8 April 2007 (EDT)

pic

This pic, from Jacques, needs to be added. Thanks for adding upping it, Jacques! Could an admin unlock this article, please? It was only locked while it was on the front page.-AmesG_yo! 23:52, 11 April 2007 (EDT)

The statue of Augustus Caesar, Augustus of Prima Porta,

Break

Why is there a random break in the opening sentence?--Iduan 22:51, 21 August 2007 (EDT)

Please revert to pre-Ames version

This page has been withdrawn from Conservapedia as part of a mass removal of content added by Ames pursuant to a copyright challenge brought by the same user. The challenge rests on two grounds:

1. Some content was added prior to the institution of Conservapedia's copyright policy on 2 April 2007, and is now removed by the user's unencumbered and uncontroverted ability to control his own content in the absence of contract or waiver to the contrary.
2. Some content, added after Conservapedia's copyright policy came into effect, is withdrawn under the below reasoning:

• If Ames supplied content gratuitously, he now revokes it.
• Any waiver executed by the user would have been a contract; however, the professed disclaimer asserts that it is not a contract. Ergo, no waiver was made.
• If the waiver was a contract, it fails for lack of consideration. No exchange was contemplated or made between the parties; detriment was suffered by user in the loss of copyrighted privileges, time, and effort put into text, but no compensation was received in turn. If use of the site constitutes compensation, such use was already provided free of charge prior to copyright waiver, and even prior to contribution, and past consideration is no consideration.
• If the waiver was a contract, it was procedurally unconscionable and voidable. User has no power under the agreement, and a simple contract of adhesion such as this one professes to be is voidable as a matter of public policy. As voidable, it is now void.
• If the waiver was a contract, and use of the site was acceptance, the contract was breached by Conservapedia. Conservapedia, by virtue of holding out certain guidelines and "commandments," incorporates these commandments into the the contract. These "commandments" were breached with regard to users, as user's access to the site was terminated without cause (under the commandments) in May 2007. Prior to May 2007, user had not violated the commandments. Having been breached, waiver is inoperative.
• If the waiver was a contract, Conservapedia was unjustly enriched by avowadly valuable material.