Difference between revisions of "Prince v. Massachusetts"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: In '''Prince v. Massachusetts''', 321 U.S. 158 (1944), the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that there is a constitutional dimension to the right of parents to direct the upbringing of the...)
 
(italics)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
In '''Prince v. Massachusetts''', 321 U.S. 158 (1944), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] confirmed that there is a constitutional dimension to the right of parents to direct the upbringing of their children. "It is cardinal with us that the custody, care and nurture of the child reside first in the parents, whose primary function and freedom include preparation for obligations the state can neither supply nor  hinder." 321 U.S. at 166.
+
In ''Prince v. Massachusetts'', 321 U.S. 158 (1944), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] confirmed that there is a constitutional dimension to the right of parents to direct the upbringing of their children. "It is cardinal with us that the custody, care and nurture of the child reside first in the parents, whose primary function and freedom include preparation for obligations the state can neither supply nor  hinder." 321 U.S. at 166.
 
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]
 
[[Category:United States Supreme Court Cases]]

Revision as of 21:27, October 7, 2007

In Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158 (1944), the U.S. Supreme Court confirmed that there is a constitutional dimension to the right of parents to direct the upbringing of their children. "It is cardinal with us that the custody, care and nurture of the child reside first in the parents, whose primary function and freedom include preparation for obligations the state can neither supply nor hinder." 321 U.S. at 166.