Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gay Bomb"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(It would have to be field tested before being combat tested) |
(edit) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Or the fact that the bomb ''didn't work''.[[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 23:44, 7 October 2007 (EDT) | :Or the fact that the bomb ''didn't work''.[[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 23:44, 7 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | ::It would have to be field tested before being combat tested, this generally is how U.S. weapons | + | ::It would have to be field tested before being combat tested, this generally is how U.S. weapons development has traditionally operated. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 01:06, 8 October 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 05:06, October 8, 2007
Did the 9/11 Commission investigate this? Perhaps if it had been funded in the Clinton era and dropped on Terrorist training camps in Afghanistan, 9/11 could have been prevented.
I smell coverup. Rob Smith 20:45, 7 October 2007 (EDT)
- Or the fact that the bomb didn't work.Maestro 23:44, 7 October 2007 (EDT)
- It would have to be field tested before being combat tested, this generally is how U.S. weapons development has traditionally operated. Rob Smith 01:06, 8 October 2007 (EDT)