Difference between revisions of "Settled science"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Replacing page with 'Exactly') |
m (Reverted edits by RedNeckBastard (Talk); changed back to last version by BrianCo) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | Donald Luskin wrote: | |
| + | :If you question whether [[global warming]] is happening, or whether human activity is causing it, or whether it’s worth doing anything about it, then you must be a crack-pot. You are standing athwart the “consensus of scientists.” You are disputing “'''settled science'''.” You are a “global warming denier,” the moral equivalent of an apologist for the Nazi holocaust. [http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDY5OTM1ZThlN2NjYTUzZjVlZmVkMDU3MDZkODM0NDM=] | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==External links== | ||
| + | *[http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDY5OTM1ZThlN2NjYTUzZjVlZmVkMDU3MDZkODM0NDM= A Convenient (and Excellent) Truth] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category:Environmentalism]] | ||
Revision as of 19:38, October 8, 2007
Donald Luskin wrote:
- If you question whether global warming is happening, or whether human activity is causing it, or whether it’s worth doing anything about it, then you must be a crack-pot. You are standing athwart the “consensus of scientists.” You are disputing “settled science.” You are a “global warming denier,” the moral equivalent of an apologist for the Nazi holocaust. [1]