Difference between revisions of "Talk:The Irish Times"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Homosexuality is illegal in Ireland? Meaning, they actually arrest you for being gay? I highly doubt that. Could one of our across-the-pond members clean this article up a bit? ~~~~)
 
(...just a clean-up?)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Homosexuality is illegal in Ireland? Meaning, they actually arrest you for being gay? I highly doubt that. Could one of our across-the-pond members clean this article up a bit? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:16, 8 October 2007 (EDT)
 
Homosexuality is illegal in Ireland? Meaning, they actually arrest you for being gay? I highly doubt that. Could one of our across-the-pond members clean this article up a bit? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 19:16, 8 October 2007 (EDT)
 +
:...clean-up? Even assuming that this isn't parody, it'd need something like a full rewrite, if just to avoid over-the-top phrases like "is guilty of this and guilty of that", which make the article look more like opinion piece and less like encyclopedia. A few sources wouldn't be bad, either. I'd tackle the former, but without sources (and for broad claims like this, it's hard to find any on the fly), I'd have to fly blindly, potentially inducing (more?) inaccuracies. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 19:27, 8 October 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 23:27, October 8, 2007

Homosexuality is illegal in Ireland? Meaning, they actually arrest you for being gay? I highly doubt that. Could one of our across-the-pond members clean this article up a bit? HelpJazz 19:16, 8 October 2007 (EDT)

...clean-up? Even assuming that this isn't parody, it'd need something like a full rewrite, if just to avoid over-the-top phrases like "is guilty of this and guilty of that", which make the article look more like opinion piece and less like encyclopedia. A few sources wouldn't be bad, either. I'd tackle the former, but without sources (and for broad claims like this, it's hard to find any on the fly), I'd have to fly blindly, potentially inducing (more?) inaccuracies. --Jenkins 19:27, 8 October 2007 (EDT)