Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bushism"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hello, Ed Poor! I wanted to ask you about the examples you deleted. I understand the last one is unsourced (but easily verifiable). However, the third one ("If you want to help, give cash money to the Red Cross and the Salvation Army") had an undisputable source. Why did you delete it, exactly? -[[User:Aralin|Aralin]] 15:06, 9 October 2007 (EDT) | Hello, Ed Poor! I wanted to ask you about the examples you deleted. I understand the last one is unsourced (but easily verifiable). However, the third one ("If you want to help, give cash money to the Red Cross and the Salvation Army") had an undisputable source. Why did you delete it, exactly? -[[User:Aralin|Aralin]] 15:06, 9 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
:Perhaps you could explain how it's a Bushism, for those of us who are a little slow? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:03, 9 October 2007 (EDT) | :Perhaps you could explain how it's a Bushism, for those of us who are a little slow? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:03, 9 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::Sure, and sorry. It is redundant, that is, more than is needed, desired or required. Repetitive, verbose, superfluous, tautologous. -[[User:Aralin|Aralin]] 16:28, 9 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 20:28, October 9, 2007
Hello, Ed Poor! I wanted to ask you about the examples you deleted. I understand the last one is unsourced (but easily verifiable). However, the third one ("If you want to help, give cash money to the Red Cross and the Salvation Army") had an undisputable source. Why did you delete it, exactly? -Aralin 15:06, 9 October 2007 (EDT)
- Perhaps you could explain how it's a Bushism, for those of us who are a little slow? HelpJazz 16:03, 9 October 2007 (EDT)
- Sure, and sorry. It is redundant, that is, more than is needed, desired or required. Repetitive, verbose, superfluous, tautologous. -Aralin 16:28, 9 October 2007 (EDT)