Difference between revisions of "User talk:Googlism"
(a note) |
(a note) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Dear editor: you have placed three links to website which appears marginal as an | + | Dear editor: you have placed three links to a website which appears marginal as an authoritive source. All links are placed in what appears to be fairly contemporary and controversial topics. The website appears to serve basically two purposes, (a) promote Ron Paul for President, and (b) trash Fred Thompson. |
Here specifically is the problem: while trashing Thompson & promoting Paul, the site attempts to align Ron Paul with [[Ronald Reagan]]. [http://web.mac.com/macinthetosh/iWeb/Site/Blog.html][http://web.mac.com/macinthetosh/iWeb/Site/Photos.html] Now, while I can appreciate these lame partisan efforts in a poltical season, please be advised there are many of us who recall that Paul, while a Republican in 1984, bolted the Republican Party to run against the Republican Party elected incumbant, Pres. Ronald Reagan. | Here specifically is the problem: while trashing Thompson & promoting Paul, the site attempts to align Ron Paul with [[Ronald Reagan]]. [http://web.mac.com/macinthetosh/iWeb/Site/Blog.html][http://web.mac.com/macinthetosh/iWeb/Site/Photos.html] Now, while I can appreciate these lame partisan efforts in a poltical season, please be advised there are many of us who recall that Paul, while a Republican in 1984, bolted the Republican Party to run against the Republican Party elected incumbant, Pres. Ronald Reagan. | ||
| − | In sum, I am not certain whether you are aware of these basics facts of history, but you need to be before proceeding. Further, these lame POV tactics are much in the vein of well known [[subversive]] activities groups, and personally there are very insulting to older readers who are aprised of the facts, making us feel that we are just too stupid to notice. So, please remove the links, and stop this nonsense. | + | In sum, I am not certain whether you are aware of these basics facts of history, but you need to be, before proceeding. Further, these lame POV tactics are much in the vein of well known [[subversive]] activities groups, and personally there are very insulting to older readers who are aprised of the facts, making us feel that we are just too stupid to notice. So, please remove the links, and stop this nonsense. |
Thank you, kindest regards, and if you are indeed a young person and not a subversive activist, don't let this message in anyway discourage you. Thanks again, and God bless. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 18:25, 15 October 2007 (EDT) | Thank you, kindest regards, and if you are indeed a young person and not a subversive activist, don't let this message in anyway discourage you. Thanks again, and God bless. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 18:25, 15 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:28, October 15, 2007
Dear editor: you have placed three links to a website which appears marginal as an authoritive source. All links are placed in what appears to be fairly contemporary and controversial topics. The website appears to serve basically two purposes, (a) promote Ron Paul for President, and (b) trash Fred Thompson.
Here specifically is the problem: while trashing Thompson & promoting Paul, the site attempts to align Ron Paul with Ronald Reagan. [1][2] Now, while I can appreciate these lame partisan efforts in a poltical season, please be advised there are many of us who recall that Paul, while a Republican in 1984, bolted the Republican Party to run against the Republican Party elected incumbant, Pres. Ronald Reagan.
In sum, I am not certain whether you are aware of these basics facts of history, but you need to be, before proceeding. Further, these lame POV tactics are much in the vein of well known subversive activities groups, and personally there are very insulting to older readers who are aprised of the facts, making us feel that we are just too stupid to notice. So, please remove the links, and stop this nonsense.
Thank you, kindest regards, and if you are indeed a young person and not a subversive activist, don't let this message in anyway discourage you. Thanks again, and God bless. Rob Smith 18:25, 15 October 2007 (EDT)