Difference between revisions of "User talk:Googlism"
(a note) |
(Revert) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Thank you, kindest regards, and if you are indeed a young person and not a subversive activist, don't let this message in anyway discourage you. Thanks again, and God bless. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 18:25, 15 October 2007 (EDT) | Thank you, kindest regards, and if you are indeed a young person and not a subversive activist, don't let this message in anyway discourage you. Thanks again, and God bless. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 18:25, 15 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Revert == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I am sorry, but I have reverted the articles where you included the controversial website. It was unclear how much direct relevance there was to the articles in question. While it is evident you have strong political views, I'm not sure it is appropriate for this setting. Perhaps you would like to help to update the article on Ron Paul? Even if you can't directly edit it, you can add your comments and sources on the talk page. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 20:56, 15 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:56, October 16, 2007
Dear editor: you have placed three links to a website which appears marginal as an authoritive source. All links are placed in what appears to be fairly contemporary and controversial topics. The website appears to serve basically two purposes, (a) promote Ron Paul for President, and (b) trash Fred Thompson.
Here specifically is the problem: while trashing Thompson & promoting Paul, the site attempts to align Ron Paul with Ronald Reagan. [1][2] Now, while I can appreciate these lame partisan efforts in a poltical season, please be advised there are many of us who recall that Paul, while a Republican in 1984, bolted the Republican Party to run against the Republican Party elected incumbant, Pres. Ronald Reagan.
In sum, I am not certain whether you are aware of these basics facts of history, but you need to be, before proceeding. Further, these lame POV tactics are much in the vein of well known subversive activities groups, and personally there are very insulting to older readers who are aprised of the facts, making us feel that we are just too stupid to notice. So, please remove the links, and stop this nonsense.
Thank you, kindest regards, and if you are indeed a young person and not a subversive activist, don't let this message in anyway discourage you. Thanks again, and God bless. Rob Smith 18:25, 15 October 2007 (EDT)
Revert
I am sorry, but I have reverted the articles where you included the controversial website. It was unclear how much direct relevance there was to the articles in question. While it is evident you have strong political views, I'm not sure it is appropriate for this setting. Perhaps you would like to help to update the article on Ron Paul? Even if you can't directly edit it, you can add your comments and sources on the talk page. Learn together 20:56, 15 October 2007 (EDT)