Difference between revisions of "Mary Ann Glendon"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(that marriage is mainly an arrangement for the benefit of adults; that children do not need both a mother and a father ???) |
m |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
She wrote: | She wrote: | ||
*"What [[same-sex marriage]] advocates have tried to present as a civil rights issue is really a bid for special preferences of the type our society gives to married couples for the very good reason that most of them are raising or have raised children." | *"What [[same-sex marriage]] advocates have tried to present as a civil rights issue is really a bid for special preferences of the type our society gives to married couples for the very good reason that most of them are raising or have raised children." | ||
| − | *"Same-sex marriage will constitute a public, official endorsement of the following extraordinary claims made by the Massachusetts judges in the Goodridge case: that marriage is mainly an arrangement for the benefit of | + | *"Same-sex marriage will constitute a public, official endorsement of the following extraordinary claims made by the Massachusetts judges in the Goodridge case: |
| + | *#that [[marriage]] is mainly an arrangement for the benefit of [[adult]]s; | ||
| + | *#that [[children]] do not need both a [[mother]] and a [[father]]; and | ||
| + | *#that [[alternative family]] forms are just as good as a husband and wife raising kids together." [http://www.afajournal.org/2004/april/404don.asp] | ||
Revision as of 21:07, October 21, 2007
Mary Ann Glendon is the Learned Hand Professor of Law at Harvard.
She wrote:
- "What same-sex marriage advocates have tried to present as a civil rights issue is really a bid for special preferences of the type our society gives to married couples for the very good reason that most of them are raising or have raised children."
- "Same-sex marriage will constitute a public, official endorsement of the following extraordinary claims made by the Massachusetts judges in the Goodridge case: