Difference between revisions of "Goodridge v. Department of Public Health"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: In ''Goodridge v. Department of Public Health'', 440 Mass. 309 (2003), the Massachusetts Supreme Court declared it to be unconstitutional for the legislature not to grant same-sex [[ma...) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 19:28, November 4, 2007
In Goodridge v. Department of Public Health, 440 Mass. 309 (2003), the Massachusetts Supreme Court declared it to be unconstitutional for the legislature not to grant same-sex marriage licenses. The Court, in an extraordinary order, gave the Massachusetts legislature 180 days to pass a law in favor of same-sex marriage.
The decision split 4-3, with the swing vote relying on the state Equal Rights Amendment. Chief Justice Margaret Marshall, a native of South Africa, cited a Canadian court in her opinion. One writer for the journal Legal Affairs described Marshall as "an advocate of mining the work of foreign courts,"[1] professor Martha Minow, who has long known Justice Marshall, said that Goodridge "is like a South Africa decision."
References
- ↑ Emily Bazelon, "A Bold Stroke," Legal Affairs and Harvard law , May-June 2004.