Difference between revisions of "Value Voters Debate"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Coverage)
m (Fred Thompson was not at that debate)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
*[[Sam Brownback]] 5%
 
*[[Sam Brownback]] 5%
 
*[[Duncan Hunter]] 4%
 
*[[Duncan Hunter]] 4%
−
*[[Fred Thompson]] 4%
 
 
*[[Tom Tancredo]] 2%
 
*[[Tom Tancredo]] 2%
 
*[[John Cox]] 1%
 
*[[John Cox]] 1%
  
 
(No-shows)
 
(No-shows)
 +
*[[Fred Thompson]] 4%
 
*[[Rudy Giuliani]] 1%
 
*[[Rudy Giuliani]] 1%
 
*[[John McCain]] 1%
 
*[[John McCain]] 1%

Revision as of 20:00, November 4, 2007

The Value Voters Debate, held on September 17th, 2007, pit many of the socially conservative members of the Republican Party against each other in a contest to win the votes of one of America's most important voting blocs. Mike Huckabee won the debate, although all candidates stood up for strong Christian values, relative to Democrat candidates, who did not show. The debaters were, in order of votes received,

(Present)

(No-shows)

Structure

The debate took the form of first a question and answer session, where prominent "panelists" would pose questions to candidates. Conservative luminary Phyllis Schlafly was among the panelists, and she received wide praise from the candidates. Also present was the Discovery Institute.

This session was followed by a series of questions in which the candidates were invited to respond "yes" or "no" to politically charged questions. Almost all candidates voted together on major issues, with the exception of Ron Paul, whose personal style distinguished him from the others.

Coverage

Radical leftist Chip Berlet, reporting on the conference said, "it was disheartening to hear from a variety of conference speakers that ... I am apparently part of a vast liberal conspiracy that promotes Sin, Secularism, Subversion, and Satan....from what I heard, as a person who opposes the war in Iraq, I am apparently not a real Christian, nor a real American---and if I caught the drift…I'm not even a real man. Therefore (goes the subtext and full text) I must hate America and love Islamic terrorism. ...The sum total of this set of assumptions is that I am consciously or unconsciously working on behalf of Satan and the Whore of Babylon, who is obviously Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton."[2]

References

  1. ↑ Value Voters Debate, http://www.valuesvoterdebate.com/
  2. ↑ Sinful, Secular, Subversive, Satanists, Chip Berlet, Wednesday, October 24, 2007. Retrieved from http://pra-wire.blogspot.com/ Novemeber 1, 2007.