Difference between revisions of "Taylor v. Anderson"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: In ''Taylor v. Anderson'', 234 U.S. 74, 75-76 (1914), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a federal claim may properly establish jurisdiction only when "unaided by anything alleged or in ...) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 16:44, November 19, 2007
In Taylor v. Anderson, 234 U.S. 74, 75-76 (1914), the U.S. Supreme Court held that a federal claim may properly establish jurisdiction only when "unaided by anything alleged or in anticipation or avoidance of defenses which it is thought the defendant may interpose."
The case concerned a dispute arising from repossession of property. The decision was unanimous.