Difference between revisions of "Talk:Antichrist"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(No) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Looks good! [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:01, 25 May 2007 (EDT) | Looks good! [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:01, 25 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| − | Do you think it is worth including some of the theories put forward for the idenitities of the anti-Christ (e.g. Hitler)? I don't think so, but any thoughts?-[[User:Sanser|Sanser]] | + | :Do you think it is worth including some of the theories put forward for the idenitities of the anti-Christ (e.g. Hitler)? I don't think so, but any thoughts?-[[User:Sanser|Sanser]] |
| + | ::No. [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 14:39, 6 December 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 19:39, December 6, 2007
This article needs a complete rewrite; it appears to be possibly written from a non Christian standpoint. DanH 22:30, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
- Not my impression, it does seem to be written by someone who doesn't think that the anti-Christ is meant to be a literal person. That's a view that many Christians have. Still, the article could use some rewriting. JoshuaZ 22:41, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
Either that or a Preterist perspective, I should clarify. DanH 22:42, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
- One doesn't need to be preterist to see the antichrist as not a single individual. Anyways, I've expanded the article and reworked parts. Let me know what you think. JoshuaZ 22:55, 25 May 2007 (EDT)
Looks good! DanH 23:01, 25 May 2007 (EDT)