Difference between revisions of "Talk:Karl Marx"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Sociologist?)
(→‎Sociologist?: Is this the "poor Marx, he was misunderstood by mass murderers" school of logic?)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
Rob, why do you have a problem with categorizing Marx as a socilogist? Capital goes beyond being an analysis of political economy to an examination of the sociological effects (as Marx understood them) of that political economy. Please discuss. [[User:Claude|Claude]] 17:16, 6 December 2007 (EST)
 
Rob, why do you have a problem with categorizing Marx as a socilogist? Capital goes beyond being an analysis of political economy to an examination of the sociological effects (as Marx understood them) of that political economy. Please discuss. [[User:Claude|Claude]] 17:16, 6 December 2007 (EST)
 +
:So, Is this the "poor Marx, he was misunderstood by [[mass murder]]ers" school of logic?  We can save ourselves a lot of time and trouble right now.  [[User:RobSmith|Rob Smith]] 17:38, 6 December 2007 (EST)

Revision as of 22:38, December 6, 2007

I don't even know where to start with this one... did whoever write this article actually read Capital (or any of Marx's works), or is she paraphrasing Wikipedia?

Really, opium was a good thing? That's weird. I thought that statement would imply that religion is a drug that desensitizes people... (In Marx's opinion, of course) I don't know too much about this guy, but from what I've seen, he looks kind of um... whacked. Mskreuz 12:58, 28 June 2007 (EDT)

Sociologist?

Rob, why do you have a problem with categorizing Marx as a socilogist? Capital goes beyond being an analysis of political economy to an examination of the sociological effects (as Marx understood them) of that political economy. Please discuss. Claude 17:16, 6 December 2007 (EST)

So, Is this the "poor Marx, he was misunderstood by mass murderers" school of logic? We can save ourselves a lot of time and trouble right now. Rob Smith 17:38, 6 December 2007 (EST)