Difference between revisions of "User talk:Danq"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(welcome, and contest)
Line 7: Line 7:
 
Welcome!  I enjoyed learning from you edits.  I, too, used to edit on [[Wikipedia]] until I realized it was hopeless.  This is much better here.
 
Welcome!  I enjoyed learning from you edits.  I, too, used to edit on [[Wikipedia]] until I realized it was hopeless.  This is much better here.
  
−
I'm a bit ahead of you on edits, but you're gaining on me!  My edit summary is [http://faleg.org/cgi-bin/conservapedia/editcounter_Tool1?username=Aschlafly here].
+
I'm a bit ahead of you on edits, but you're gaining on me!  My edit summary is [http://faleg.org/cgi-bin/conservapedia/editcounter_Tool1?username=Aschlafly here] (beware, the tool is slow in summarizing my edits!).
  
 
I'm 0-3 in contests but hope to win the fourth.  I'd be honored if you could be on my team when the next contest starts up.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:44, 8 December 2007 (EST)
 
I'm 0-3 in contests but hope to win the fourth.  I'd be honored if you could be on my team when the next contest starts up.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 18:44, 8 December 2007 (EST)

Revision as of 23:44, December 8, 2007

Welcome!

Hello, Danq, and welcome to Conservapedia!

We're glad you are here to edit. We ask that you read our Editor's Guide before you edit.

At the right are some useful links for you. You can include these links on your user page by putting "{{Useful links}}" on the page. Any questions--ask!

Thanks for reading, Danq!


Philip J. Rayment 04:52, 4 December 2007 (EST)

Kent Hovind

The revised edit is better, but I'm still uneasy about it. Conservapedia's policy against posting gossip is not merely against posting unsubstantiated claims, but also against saying negative things about people unless there is good reason to do so. The claim about Hovind's doctorate is the opinion of one person (i.e. we haven't heard Hovind's side of it) and by someone who obviously is opposed to what Hovind teaches. On the other hand, she does appear to make a strong case (with some exceptions) and to be reasonably objective about it. I will consult with other sysops on this, but for the moment I will leave your edit there. Philip J. Rayment 04:52, 4 December 2007 (EST)

Welcome, and Contest

Welcome! I enjoyed learning from you edits. I, too, used to edit on Wikipedia until I realized it was hopeless. This is much better here.

I'm a bit ahead of you on edits, but you're gaining on me! My edit summary is here (beware, the tool is slow in summarizing my edits!).

I'm 0-3 in contests but hope to win the fourth. I'd be honored if you could be on my team when the next contest starts up.--Aschlafly 18:44, 8 December 2007 (EST)