Difference between revisions of "Talk:Parthian shot"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (more) |
(re) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I wonder, is it wise to list examples of people pointing out Conservapedia's (percieved) flaws? Additionally, links 2, 3, and 4 are broken because they have been deleted. Lastly, why is this protected? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:19, 27 December 2007 (EST) | I wonder, is it wise to list examples of people pointing out Conservapedia's (percieved) flaws? Additionally, links 2, 3, and 4 are broken because they have been deleted. Lastly, why is this protected? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:19, 27 December 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | :First, It ''is'' appropriate to list examples of Conservapedia editors using the Parthian shot; Second, the links are fixed; Third, the article is now unprotected. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 00:53, 28 December 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 05:53, December 28, 2007
And disastrously so, I might add. Some kind historian, please fix! Human 02:37, 28 April 2007 (EDT)
I wonder, is it wise to list examples of people pointing out Conservapedia's (percieved) flaws? Additionally, links 2, 3, and 4 are broken because they have been deleted. Lastly, why is this protected? HelpJazz 16:19, 27 December 2007 (EST)
- First, It is appropriate to list examples of Conservapedia editors using the Parthian shot; Second, the links are fixed; Third, the article is now unprotected. --Crocoite 00:53, 28 December 2007 (EST)