Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pro-abortion"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: I know it's a bit late to comment, but how is an explanation of the term "liberal bias"? Or, how would you put it ("the term comes from the idea that...") in a non-liberally-biassed way? -...) |
(Why are the Conservapedia Commandments not being followed?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I know it's a bit late to comment, but how is an explanation of the term "liberal bias"? Or, how would you put it ("the term comes from the idea that...") in a non-liberally-biassed way? | I know it's a bit late to comment, but how is an explanation of the term "liberal bias"? Or, how would you put it ("the term comes from the idea that...") in a non-liberally-biassed way? | ||
--[[User:G7mzh|G7mzh]] 10:21, 27 July 2007 (EDT) | --[[User:G7mzh|G7mzh]] 10:21, 27 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Why are the Conservapedia Commandments not being followed? == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I see that when I had edited out an opinion, leaving a factual statement, the opinion was restored without comment. How is that adhering to the commandments to rely on verifiable facts in these articles, and how can you expect people to find Conservapedia credible when the commandments are applied subjectively? I'd appreciate a response. | ||
Revision as of 16:56, December 28, 2007
I know it's a bit late to comment, but how is an explanation of the term "liberal bias"? Or, how would you put it ("the term comes from the idea that...") in a non-liberally-biassed way? --G7mzh 10:21, 27 July 2007 (EDT)
Why are the Conservapedia Commandments not being followed?
I see that when I had edited out an opinion, leaving a factual statement, the opinion was restored without comment. How is that adhering to the commandments to rely on verifiable facts in these articles, and how can you expect people to find Conservapedia credible when the commandments are applied subjectively? I'd appreciate a response.