Difference between revisions of "Directed verdict"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
({{merge|verdict}})
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{merge|verdict}}
 
A directed [[verdict]] is a verdict rendered by a [[judge]] who takes the issue away from a [[jury]].  Strictly speaking, the judge directs the jury to render the particular verdict.
 
A directed [[verdict]] is a verdict rendered by a [[judge]] who takes the issue away from a [[jury]].  Strictly speaking, the judge directs the jury to render the particular verdict.
  
 
Typically a directed verdict is in a case in which the [[plaintiff]] has failed to present on the facts of his case proper [[evidence]] for jury consideration, and the trial judge orders the entry of a verdict without allowing the jury to consider it.
 
Typically a directed verdict is in a case in which the [[plaintiff]] has failed to present on the facts of his case proper [[evidence]] for jury consideration, and the trial judge orders the entry of a verdict without allowing the jury to consider it.
 
[[category:law]]
 
[[category:law]]

Revision as of 04:52, January 6, 2008

It has been suggested that this article or section be merged with [[::verdict|verdict]]. (Discuss)

A directed verdict is a verdict rendered by a judge who takes the issue away from a jury. Strictly speaking, the judge directs the jury to render the particular verdict.

Typically a directed verdict is in a case in which the plaintiff has failed to present on the facts of his case proper evidence for jury consideration, and the trial judge orders the entry of a verdict without allowing the jury to consider it.