::I'm primarily concerned with good articles. Plenty of people are out there "fighting racism". But 49 out of your last 50 edits were talk, so I'm giving you a 3-day block. Take a walk, read a book, etc. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:13, 21 August 2007 (EDT)
:::This user continues to work unproductively (majority of last 100 edits have been on talk pages. I'm issuing another block. When/if you return, please contribute positively to mainspace. [[User:Jallen|<font color="#4d4d4d">Jallen</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jallen|talk]]</sup> 09:38, 28 August 2007 (EDT)
== a warning ==
Please do not put lame atheism apologetics in the atheism article. Lame atheism apologetics are not appropriate for a conservative encyclopedia. I don't want to block you and please heed this warning. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 21:27, 28 August 2007 (EDT)
:Where would atheist apologetics go if '''not''' in the article titled "Atheism"? [[User Talk:Samwell|Samwell]] 21:42, 28 August 2007 (EDT)
Yeah, here's another warning - but first let me quote you:
*equating Stalinism with atheism is as much a fallacy as equating Christianity with the Spanish inquisition
I'm not sure where you're going with this, but it seems to be a denial of any link between Stalinism and atheism. This would seem to be an error, as Stalin promoted the atheism inherent in [[Dialectical Materialism]], which is the philosophical core of [[Communism]].
:There is a link. Marxism and later Stalinism were both materialist atheist theories. But Atheism and Stalinism aren't the same. [[User:Order|Order]] 00:23, 29 August 2007 (EDT)
I warn you not to make false or confusing statements in talk pages. You wanna make an argument that persuades other users, try [[Debate:Was Stalin an atheist?]] or something like that. Don't use talk pages as a soapbox. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 23:54, 28 August 2007 (EDT)
Stalin was an atheist. Sure, did I say otherwise? I discussed Lysenkoism, a materialist theory of evolution, and it did cost a lot of peoples lives, especially its inhumane and fruitless application in agriculture, so it is worth mentioning it. [[User:Order|Order]] 00:08, 29 August 2007 (EDT)
== [[Atheism]] ==
See this:[[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Ed_Poor#.5B.5BAtheism.5D.5D]] Thanks! --<font color="#0002AC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝôρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="OOFFAA">[[User_Talk:TK|Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 16:04, 29 August 2007 (EDT)
==Fig leaf gibe==
Don't speculate on what other contributors can or cannot feel. [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Debate:Right_and_wrong_in_Myanmar&diff=next&oldid=300784] --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 15:08, 27 September 2007 (EDT)
== please see my last post on the dawkins talk page ==
please see my last post on the dawkins talk page. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 15:38, 22 October 2007 (EDT)
:Its an interesting discussion to say the least, but as long as the revert war is going on, I'll keep watching rather than participating. [[User:Order|Order]] 22:16, 22 October 2007 (EDT)
:::There is no longer a revert war. I also believe that you commenting on my historiography post might be helpful if you do it in the right spirit. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:27, 22 October 2007 (EDT)
*Yes, it is important that you comment in the "right spirit", Order. :P --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 22:30, 22 October 2007 (EDT)
:OK, I'll go have a few drink for lunch, and give it a try:) [[User:Order|Order]] 22:32, 22 October 2007 (EDT)
:*I have beat you to it, of course, it being almost Eight here! A nice Bombay, up and very cold, with two twists! :P --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 22:45, 22 October 2007 (EDT)
::TK, hope I didn't have too many. Conservative, I am also a bit concerned, now that also McIntyre weighed in, that you got more than you bargained for. Peace be upon you. [[User:Order|Order]] 02:52, 23 October 2007 (EDT)
*Well, I stop usually at one, darn it! Too many buzz killers here. You gave a reasoned response. It is too bad Kenservative will not apply the same reasoning to several of "his" other articles, isn't it? The one's he has kept locked for months, not allowing any other editor to touch, and on the rare occasions he does, always reverts their additions, without ever once applying that "historiography" approach of reason. Oh well. Cheers! --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 05:37, 23 October 2007 (EDT)
==[[Science]] and [[falsifiability]]==
Hi, Order. I like what you said:
:The article is about falsifiability. It says that scientist can have it wrong. They propose a theory, look for evidence, and then its wrong, and they have to amend or change the theory.
What else do you know about science? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 12:02, 16 December 2007 (EST)
This is all you need to know. [[User:Order|Order]] 17:40, 16 December 2007 (EST)
== Quit ==
With the "I am a way from the computer right now." and sign in! --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şŷŝoρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 03:24, 29 October 2007 (EDT)
== AIM ==
You never seem to be logged in even when editing here. Do you have an email address that you could register here? [[User:Ajkgordon|Ajkgordon]] 10:42, 9 January 2008 (EST)
My email works. Had my computer reinstalled. Give me a sec to reinstall AIM. [[User:Order|Order]] 11:01, 9 January 2008 (EST)
Nah. When clicking on the email this user link, I get the "This user has not specified a valid e-mail address, or has chosen not to receive e-mail from other users." message. I'll wait for you to pop up on AIM. [[User:Ajkgordon|Ajkgordon]] 11:02, 9 January 2008 (EST)
Ok, done.