Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:Sysop complaint documentation"
(one more) |
(re) |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
==User:Aschlafly== | ==User:Aschlafly== | ||
This administrator reverted twice, without justification, an edit to [[Talk:Shaken Baby Syndrome]][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Shaken_Baby_Syndrome&action=history]. I think that this is an abuse of sysop powers. ...[[User:RingWraith|RingWraith]] 19:53, 12 January 2008 (EST) | This administrator reverted twice, without justification, an edit to [[Talk:Shaken Baby Syndrome]][http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk:Shaken_Baby_Syndrome&action=history]. I think that this is an abuse of sysop powers. ...[[User:RingWraith|RingWraith]] 19:53, 12 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | :Reverting isn't even a sysop power - anyone can do that. The first site that SSchultz used is inappropriate for CP - SSchultz was adequately warned of that the first time he posted.--<small>[[User:Iduan|<span style="color: #FFCCCC; background: #660000">I]][[User_talk:Iduan|<span style="color:#CCCCFF; background:#000033">Duan]]</span></span></small> 19:58, 12 January 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 00:58, January 13, 2008
| Quick Links | This is where you can report abuse by Sysops. Please make notes short and concise. Do not piggyback! One new header per complaint. Unsigned posts will be removed. |
Archives Archive 1
|
Fox
Fox was barred for protesting against an inaccurate and offensive article. He should be reinstated at once, preferably with an apology from the sysop who sought to stifle freedom of speech in such an arbitrary and high handed manner. Pachyderm 10:46, 14 June 2007 (EDT)
- You need to remember that this is CP. If Fox sais something out of line with CP's principles, he should have been banned.--Fbaker 11:02, 14 June 2007 (EDT)
- Fox was blocked for a total of 24 hours, by me originally, and that was removed a mere 6 hours, if that, into it. Because of the "article" Fox got at me on YIM, and asked that his account be deleted. I have seen at least one edit from him since the block was removed, so it doesn't seem he has left to me. --Sysop-TK /MyTalk 05:17, 15 June 2007 (EDT)
Crippes blocking
Crippes was a positive user with some good edits, but was still blocked. Duddgydids 16:52, 8 June 2007 (EDT)
- Crippes was blocked for creating a sock which caused some vandalism. Karajou 16:58, 8 June 2007 (EDT)
I'm not the same as "Carlowcrab", Duddgydids 17:05, 8 June 2007 (EDT)
- Then what is your purpose here? Karajou 17:08, 8 June 2007 (EDT)
User:Aschlafly
This administrator reverted twice, without justification, an edit to Talk:Shaken Baby Syndrome[1]. I think that this is an abuse of sysop powers. ...RingWraith 19:53, 12 January 2008 (EST)