Difference between revisions of "Bates v. State Bar of Arizona"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: In ''Bates v. State Bar of Arizona'', 433 U.S. 350 (1977), the U.S. Supreme Court held that enforcement of a ban on attorney advertising would violate the First and [[Fourteenth Amendm...) |
(Bold, links) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | In ''Bates v. State Bar of Arizona'', 433 U.S. 350 (1977), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that enforcement of a ban on attorney advertising would violate the First and [[Fourteenth Amendment]] rights of attorneys seeking to advertise the fees they charged for certain routine legal services. | + | In '''''Bates v. State Bar of Arizona''''', 433 U.S. 350 (1977), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that enforcement of a ban on [[attorney]] advertising would violate the [[First Amendment|First]] and [[Fourteenth Amendment]] rights of attorneys seeking to advertise the fees they charged for certain routine legal services. |
| + | |||
[[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | [[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | ||
[[category:First Amendment]] | [[category:First Amendment]] | ||
[[category:Fourteenth Amendment]] | [[category:Fourteenth Amendment]] | ||
Revision as of 05:38, January 15, 2008
In Bates v. State Bar of Arizona, 433 U.S. 350 (1977), the U.S. Supreme Court held that enforcement of a ban on attorney advertising would violate the First and Fourteenth Amendment rights of attorneys seeking to advertise the fees they charged for certain routine legal services.