Difference between revisions of "Talk:Rock music"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: That reference is, eh, not all that great. It's a bit out there. The statement can stand (as I wrote it, anyway) because some people do believe that all rock music is evil (see [[Jack Chic...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
That reference is, eh, not all that great. It's a bit out there. The statement can stand (as I wrote it, anyway) because some people do believe that all rock music is evil (see [[Jack Chick]], for example) but this is not a fact, but an opinion. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 22:20, 31 December 2007 (EST)
 
That reference is, eh, not all that great. It's a bit out there. The statement can stand (as I wrote it, anyway) because some people do believe that all rock music is evil (see [[Jack Chick]], for example) but this is not a fact, but an opinion. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 22:20, 31 December 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
Actually, I think that the link ''should'' be removed. It's absurd to say that rock is all evil just because of a few bands. There are some Christians that are evil people but that doesn't mean we are evil. You can't judge an entire group by a few of its members. Besides, I've been to that particular website before and the man who runs it is very ignorant.

Revision as of 16:04, January 20, 2008

That reference is, eh, not all that great. It's a bit out there. The statement can stand (as I wrote it, anyway) because some people do believe that all rock music is evil (see Jack Chick, for example) but this is not a fact, but an opinion. HelpJazz 22:20, 31 December 2007 (EST)

Actually, I think that the link should be removed. It's absurd to say that rock is all evil just because of a few bands. There are some Christians that are evil people but that doesn't mean we are evil. You can't judge an entire group by a few of its members. Besides, I've been to that particular website before and the man who runs it is very ignorant.