Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay:Conservatism Essential to Religion"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(hope you can do better than that!)
(Please.)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
: Hope you can do better than that!  I'm not optimistic.  :-( --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:38, 20 January 2008 (EST)
 
: Hope you can do better than that!  I'm not optimistic.  :-( --[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:38, 20 January 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
# "conservatism reacts quickly to ever-changing liberal assaults on values".
 +
#:I don't see how that's relevant to conservatism being essential to religion.
 +
# "conservatism explains how government affects people's beliefs and conduct"
 +
#:And nothing else does?
 +
# "modern media did not exist when religion developed, and conservatism is needed to combat media"
 +
#:Okay… that's not tangent at all, is it?
 +
# "church is once-a-week or less for most people, while conservatism is 24x7"
 +
#:And that's totally essential to religion. Yep. Entirely. That's absurd, Andy. Now you're insinuating that conservatism substitutes for religion?
 +
# "public schools did not exist when religion developed, and conservatism is needed to educate students"
 +
#:Since when is the latter true?
 +
 +
--[[User:MakeTomorrow|<font color="#00ff00">Make</font><font color="#0000ff">Tomorrow</font>]] 20:43, 20 January 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 01:43, January 21, 2008

This is the most abject example of ludicrous rubbish I have ever had the great misfortune to encounter. --MakeTomorrow 20:37, 20 January 2008 (EST)

Hope you can do better than that! I'm not optimistic. :-( --Aschlafly 20:38, 20 January 2008 (EST)
  1. "conservatism reacts quickly to ever-changing liberal assaults on values".
    I don't see how that's relevant to conservatism being essential to religion.
  2. "conservatism explains how government affects people's beliefs and conduct"
    And nothing else does?
  3. "modern media did not exist when religion developed, and conservatism is needed to combat media"
    Okay… that's not tangent at all, is it?
  4. "church is once-a-week or less for most people, while conservatism is 24x7"
    And that's totally essential to religion. Yep. Entirely. That's absurd, Andy. Now you're insinuating that conservatism substitutes for religion?
  5. "public schools did not exist when religion developed, and conservatism is needed to educate students"
    Since when is the latter true?

--MakeTomorrow 20:43, 20 January 2008 (EST)