Difference between revisions of "User talk:RobertK"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Thank you!) |
Feebasfactor (talk | contribs) (kind of inevitable now) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Good comments to "Immaculate Conception," and good spotting on our trolly friend on the main page. I'll keep a watch on him.-[[User:MexMax|MexMax]] 12:38, 27 January 2008 (EST) | Good comments to "Immaculate Conception," and good spotting on our trolly friend on the main page. I'll keep a watch on him.-[[User:MexMax|MexMax]] 12:38, 27 January 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Really == | ||
| + | |||
| + | [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Talk%3ABarack_Obama&diff=383581&oldid=383574 Was that actually worth it?] [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 21:11, 1 February 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 02:11, February 2, 2008
Transgender edit
I reverted it because it was very vague and wooly; it neither presented a fact nor offered evidence to disprove an assertion, but just invited a reader to figure it out for themself. 10px Fox (talk|contribs) 19:15, 22 January 2008 (EST)
Thank you!
Good comments to "Immaculate Conception," and good spotting on our trolly friend on the main page. I'll keep a watch on him.-MexMax 12:38, 27 January 2008 (EST)
Really
Was that actually worth it? Feebasfactor 21:11, 1 February 2008 (EST)