Difference between revisions of "Talk:Heath Ledger"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: I don't want to step on your toes Andy but the phrase "Though portrayed as a symbol of the future..." seems a bit editorial without some sort of citation. The sentence would read better w...) |
(reply) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't want to step on your toes Andy but the phrase "Though portrayed as a symbol of the future..." seems a bit editorial without some sort of citation. The sentence would read better without it in my view. --[[User:CarolineMilton|CarolineMilton]] 22:52, 5 February 2008 (EST) | I don't want to step on your toes Andy but the phrase "Though portrayed as a symbol of the future..." seems a bit editorial without some sort of citation. The sentence would read better without it in my view. --[[User:CarolineMilton|CarolineMilton]] 22:52, 5 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I've taken a quick look and found stories that generally, though not specifically, cast Ledger in that light. I could add references that describe Brokeback Mountain in those terms, even by a Utah newspaper [http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,635179229,00.html here].--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:21, 5 February 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 04:21, February 6, 2008
I don't want to step on your toes Andy but the phrase "Though portrayed as a symbol of the future..." seems a bit editorial without some sort of citation. The sentence would read better without it in my view. --CarolineMilton 22:52, 5 February 2008 (EST)