Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:AFD Homosexuality and English Speaking Countries"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: I'm sorry, I know there's been a drive to get a comprehensive set of articles on homosexuality and all the associated issues, but this one should go. It's badly written, provides no infor...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I'm sorry, I know there's been a drive to get a comprehensive set of articles on homosexuality and all the associated issues, but this one should go. It's badly written, provides no information, and simply provides links to a set of associated articles. The proper way of grouping associated articles in one place is to use a category - although I'm not going to begin to suggest what the category would be in this case! [[User:Ferret|-- Ferret]] [[User talk:Ferret|<sub>Nice old chat</sub>]] 05:19, 14 February 2008 (EST) | I'm sorry, I know there's been a drive to get a comprehensive set of articles on homosexuality and all the associated issues, but this one should go. It's badly written, provides no information, and simply provides links to a set of associated articles. The proper way of grouping associated articles in one place is to use a category - although I'm not going to begin to suggest what the category would be in this case! [[User:Ferret|-- Ferret]] [[User talk:Ferret|<sub>Nice old chat</sub>]] 05:19, 14 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | :Agree delete. If it is really considered necessary to have an in-depth set of articles about the legal positions of various countries, they should be grouped within one single article or added as a section to the main article. [[Image:User Fox.png|10px]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 05:26, 14 February 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 10:26, February 14, 2008
I'm sorry, I know there's been a drive to get a comprehensive set of articles on homosexuality and all the associated issues, but this one should go. It's badly written, provides no information, and simply provides links to a set of associated articles. The proper way of grouping associated articles in one place is to use a category - although I'm not going to begin to suggest what the category would be in this case! -- Ferret Nice old chat 05:19, 14 February 2008 (EST)
