Difference between revisions of "User talk:Leibniz"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(Your entry on my talk page)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
:Thanks for contributing, however please don't put opinion in articles without sourcing it. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 19:53, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 
:Thanks for contributing, however please don't put opinion in articles without sourcing it. [[User:Geo.plrd|Geo.]] 19:53, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Your entry on my talk page ==
 +
 +
Your entry on my talk page is a unexeptable insult.
 +
"This user is a known radical Islamic sympathizer.
 +
 +
Edits by this user on religious articles should be taken with little credibility."
 +
 +
* First: I am not radical
 +
* Second: I am not sypathising with Islam
 +
* Third: "This user is known" implies that there is a proof for this lies
 +
 +
An isult like this is not aceptable at all. This insult is able to discredit my name and my person.
 +
It is against the rules of conservapedia and it is against the law.
 +
If you do not stop insults like this, I may consider taking legal actions. --[[User:Bodenseemann|Bodenseemann]] 14:26, 15 March 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 18:26, March 15, 2007

Thanks for contributing, however please don't put opinion in articles without sourcing it. Geo. 19:53, 13 March 2007 (EDT)

Your entry on my talk page

Your entry on my talk page is a unexeptable insult. "This user is a known radical Islamic sympathizer.

Edits by this user on religious articles should be taken with little credibility."

  • First: I am not radical
  • Second: I am not sypathising with Islam
  • Third: "This user is known" implies that there is a proof for this lies

An isult like this is not aceptable at all. This insult is able to discredit my name and my person. It is against the rules of conservapedia and it is against the law. If you do not stop insults like this, I may consider taking legal actions. --Bodenseemann 14:26, 15 March 2007 (EDT)