Difference between revisions of "User talk:Walton One"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(fed up with having a redlinked talk page)
 
(1=3, what are you, a Trinitarian? ;-)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I'm only sporadically active on Conservapedia, so if I don't respond to messages after a few days, try [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Walton_One my Wikipedia talk page instead].
 
I'm only sporadically active on Conservapedia, so if I don't respond to messages after a few days, try [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Walton_One my Wikipedia talk page instead].
 +
 +
:[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Expelled:_No_Intelligence_Allowed&diff=next&oldid=373363 This edit] reminds me of a joke told by an old statistician: "There are three kinds of people in the world, those who can count properly and those who can't."
 +
 +
:Dawkins is the one who said he would not have done the interview if he knew the film's purpose. The other two said they would have done it anyway.
 +
 +
:Please be more careful in the future when contributing to article on controversial topics here. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 13:56, 15 February 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 18:56, February 15, 2008

I'm only sporadically active on Conservapedia, so if I don't respond to messages after a few days, try my Wikipedia talk page instead.

This edit reminds me of a joke told by an old statistician: "There are three kinds of people in the world, those who can count properly and those who can't."
Dawkins is the one who said he would not have done the interview if he knew the film's purpose. The other two said they would have done it anyway.
Please be more careful in the future when contributing to article on controversial topics here. --Ed Poor Talk 13:56, 15 February 2008 (EST)