Difference between revisions of "Talk:Conservapedia terms"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Minister's son) |
(→Minister's son: reply) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Yes, okay, I can grant that this term was invented here. But why? Isn't it just different wording for what has long been known as a PK, or ''Preacher's kid''? Perhaps I should invent the term Missionary's Son, despite the term MK or ''Missionary's kid'' already being in long use? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:00, 16 February 2008 (EST) | Yes, okay, I can grant that this term was invented here. But why? Isn't it just different wording for what has long been known as a PK, or ''Preacher's kid''? Perhaps I should invent the term Missionary's Son, despite the term MK or ''Missionary's kid'' already being in long use? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:00, 16 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : Not familiar with "preacher's kid," and that sounds slightly derogatory. We wouldn't say "Kid of Man" instead of "Son of Man," would we? The [[Minister's son]] is to describe an insight that [[liberal]]s deny.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:03, 16 February 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 14:03, February 16, 2008
Minister's son
Yes, okay, I can grant that this term was invented here. But why? Isn't it just different wording for what has long been known as a PK, or Preacher's kid? Perhaps I should invent the term Missionary's Son, despite the term MK or Missionary's kid already being in long use? Philip J. Rayment 09:00, 16 February 2008 (EST)
- Not familiar with "preacher's kid," and that sounds slightly derogatory. We wouldn't say "Kid of Man" instead of "Son of Man," would we? The Minister's son is to describe an insight that liberals deny.--Aschlafly 09:03, 16 February 2008 (EST)