Difference between revisions of "Deliberate ignorance"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(fixed)
(improved)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
* [[materialists]] refuse to address the impossibility of material explanation for [[migration]] and [[homing]]
 
* [[materialists]] refuse to address the impossibility of material explanation for [[migration]] and [[homing]]
−
* [[evolutionists]] refuse to address the lack of a plausible evolutionary path for the [[whale]]<ref>This is disputed by evolutionists at [http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/02/two_tales_of_whale_evolution.php well defined].</ref>
+
* [[evolutionists]] refuse to address the lack of a plausible evolutionary path for the [[whale]]<ref>This is disputed by evolutionists at a blog worth reviewing further for plausibility at [http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/02/two_tales_of_whale_evolution.php].</ref>
 
* [[liberals]] refuse to address how [[socialism]] destroys productivity
 
* [[liberals]] refuse to address how [[socialism]] destroys productivity
 
* [[abortionists]] refuse to address the undisclosed harm to the mothers who have [[abortions]]
 
* [[abortionists]] refuse to address the undisclosed harm to the mothers who have [[abortions]]

Revision as of 01:12, February 24, 2008

Deliberate ignorance is the practice of refusing to consider or discuss logic or evidence disproving ideologically motivated positions. Examples include:

  • materialists refuse to address the impossibility of material explanation for migration and homing
  • evolutionists refuse to address the lack of a plausible evolutionary path for the whale[1]
  • liberals refuse to address how socialism destroys productivity
  • abortionists refuse to address the undisclosed harm to the mothers who have abortions
  • Advocates of the global warming theory refuse to consider any scientific evidence which shows that natural causes have always had a greater effect on terrestial air temperature than human activity.

(add more)

References

  1. ↑ This is disputed by evolutionists at a blog worth reviewing further for plausibility at [1].