Difference between revisions of "Deliberate ignorance"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(improved)
(added point about Obama, from main page discussion)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''Deliberate ignorance''' is the practice of refusing to consider or discuss logic or evidence disproving ideologically motivated positions.  Examples include:
 
'''Deliberate ignorance''' is the practice of refusing to consider or discuss logic or evidence disproving ideologically motivated positions.  Examples include:
  
 +
* [[Democrats]] refusing to acknowledge [[Barack Obama]]'s appeal to unpatriotic donors and supporters
 
* [[materialists]] refuse to address the impossibility of material explanation for [[migration]] and [[homing]]
 
* [[materialists]] refuse to address the impossibility of material explanation for [[migration]] and [[homing]]
 
* [[evolutionists]] refuse to address the lack of a plausible evolutionary path for the [[whale]]<ref>This is disputed by evolutionists at a blog worth reviewing further for plausibility at [http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/02/two_tales_of_whale_evolution.php].</ref>
 
* [[evolutionists]] refuse to address the lack of a plausible evolutionary path for the [[whale]]<ref>This is disputed by evolutionists at a blog worth reviewing further for plausibility at [http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/02/two_tales_of_whale_evolution.php].</ref>

Revision as of 21:04, February 24, 2008

Deliberate ignorance is the practice of refusing to consider or discuss logic or evidence disproving ideologically motivated positions. Examples include:

(add more)

References

  1. ↑ This is disputed by evolutionists at a blog worth reviewing further for plausibility at [1].