Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wikipedia police"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Source please? For this page or any on this site, really. [[User:NoraReed|NoraReed]] 15:33, 27 February 2008 (EST) | Source please? For this page or any on this site, really. [[User:NoraReed|NoraReed]] 15:33, 27 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is getting ridiculous. I saw you make up this term on the main page Andy. You went from talking about the 'Wikipedia police' to saying, 'That deserves its own entry'. Based on...? | ||
| + | [[User:MetcalfeM|MetcalfeM]] 15:44, 27 February 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 20:44, February 27, 2008
Guess what I am going to ask. Do you have any evidence AT ALL to back up this page?--KimSell 13:48, 27 February 2008 (EST)
Come on. Seriously? Judging by the flurry of hilarious articles recenetly created by him, this guy has completely lost it. Also, should there be a mention of Conservapedia police, mentioning the likes of Karajou and Crocoite? His tenuous link to reality has finally been cut. Schoenberg 15:21, 27 February 2008 (EST)
Source please? For this page or any on this site, really. NoraReed 15:33, 27 February 2008 (EST)
This is getting ridiculous. I saw you make up this term on the main page Andy. You went from talking about the 'Wikipedia police' to saying, 'That deserves its own entry'. Based on...? MetcalfeM 15:44, 27 February 2008 (EST)