Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wikipedia police"
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
This is getting ridiculous. I saw you make up this term on the main page Andy. You went from talking about the 'Wikipedia police' to saying, 'That deserves its own entry'. Based on...? | This is getting ridiculous. I saw you make up this term on the main page Andy. You went from talking about the 'Wikipedia police' to saying, 'That deserves its own entry'. Based on...? | ||
[[User:MetcalfeM|MetcalfeM]] 15:44, 27 February 2008 (EST) | [[User:MetcalfeM|MetcalfeM]] 15:44, 27 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | "They almost never have user names reflecting their real names"--well, with the amount of identity theft and perverts out there, isn't that what your supposed to do? [[User:Maestro|Maestro]] 23:27, 27 February 2008 (EST) (Brian Katcher) | ||
Revision as of 04:27, February 28, 2008
Guess what I am going to ask. Do you have any evidence AT ALL to back up this page?--KimSell 13:48, 27 February 2008 (EST)
Come on. Seriously? Judging by the flurry of hilarious articles recenetly created by him, this guy has completely lost it. Also, should there be a mention of Conservapedia police, mentioning the likes of Karajou and Crocoite? His tenuous link to reality has finally been cut. Schoenberg 15:21, 27 February 2008 (EST)
Source please? For this page or any on this site, really. NoraReed 15:33, 27 February 2008 (EST)
This is getting ridiculous. I saw you make up this term on the main page Andy. You went from talking about the 'Wikipedia police' to saying, 'That deserves its own entry'. Based on...? MetcalfeM 15:44, 27 February 2008 (EST)
"They almost never have user names reflecting their real names"--well, with the amount of identity theft and perverts out there, isn't that what your supposed to do? Maestro 23:27, 27 February 2008 (EST) (Brian Katcher)