Difference between revisions of "User talk:RSchlafly"
Conservative (talk | contribs) (reply) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) (→reply) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== reply == | == reply == | ||
| − | I banned him because 3 times in row he posted to my userpage the same cross examination type garbage much of which was unrelated to the article in question. I warned him to stop though and he ignored me. Three strikes and your out. | + | I banned him because 3 times in row he posted to my userpage the same cross examination type garbage much of which (if not all) was unrelated to the article in question. I warned him to stop though and he ignored me. Three strikes and your out. |
Secondly, are you related to Aschlafly? | Secondly, are you related to Aschlafly? | ||
[[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:36, 15 March 2007 (EDT)conservative | [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:36, 15 March 2007 (EDT)conservative | ||
Revision as of 21:37, March 15, 2007
good edit to Einstein article.--Aschlafly 00:14, 9 March 2007 (EST)
Thanks Roger. Whatever I can do to help, let me know. Are there any plans for coordinated projects similiar to like they have over in, you know, that other place? RobS 12:48, 9 March 2007 (EST)
Review
Roger, here's some material you may wish to review regarding "expansion of due process", [1]
- it can be argued that the legislative intent of the Amendment was especially to grow with the times, which it certainly has done. RobS 11:37, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
Gospel of Thomas
It is true that the Gospel of Thomas is not part of the Bible, and not recognized outside the Coptic Christian church; I simply wanted to clarify that it nevertheless is a valuable source of information about early Christian beliefs, and that many Christians today do find great value in it. Boethius 15:33, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
- It is my understanding that Christians have historically regarded these apocryphal gospels as being tainted with heresy. Yes, fascinating, but fascinating in the way that heresy is fascinating. I didn't want the Thomas entry to imply that Thomas is a good source of Christian beliefs. RSchlafly 23:04, 14 March 2007 (EDT)
reply
I banned him because 3 times in row he posted to my userpage the same cross examination type garbage much of which (if not all) was unrelated to the article in question. I warned him to stop though and he ignored me. Three strikes and your out.
Secondly, are you related to Aschlafly?
Conservative 17:36, 15 March 2007 (EDT)conservative