Difference between revisions of "Embraced deceit"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(reference needed - not a link to a prejudiced list)
m (Reverted edits by JBuscombe (Talk); changed back to last version by Aschlafly)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''Embraced deceit''' is [[deceit]] that is knowingly allowed, defended or even promoted for ideological purposes.  Not only did the perpetrator of the [[deceit]] promote it, but his allies were complicit also.
 
'''Embraced deceit''' is [[deceit]] that is knowingly allowed, defended or even promoted for ideological purposes.  Not only did the perpetrator of the [[deceit]] promote it, but his allies were complicit also.
  
'''Embraced deceit''' is common among [[liberals]], but non-existent among [[conservatives]].{{fact}}
+
'''Embraced deceit''' is common among [[liberals]], but non-existent among [[conservatives]].<ref>See a partial list of examples at [[deceit]].</ref>
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==

Revision as of 20:30, March 8, 2008

Embraced deceit is deceit that is knowingly allowed, defended or even promoted for ideological purposes. Not only did the perpetrator of the deceit promote it, but his allies were complicit also.

Embraced deceit is common among liberals, but non-existent among conservatives.[1]

References

  1. See a partial list of examples at deceit.