Difference between revisions of "Embraced deceit"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Reverted edits by JBuscombe (Talk); changed back to last version by Aschlafly)
("partial list" and "examples" are redundant)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''Embraced deceit''' is [[deceit]] that is knowingly allowed, defended or even promoted for ideological purposes.  Not only did the perpetrator of the [[deceit]] promote it, but his allies were complicit also.
 
'''Embraced deceit''' is [[deceit]] that is knowingly allowed, defended or even promoted for ideological purposes.  Not only did the perpetrator of the [[deceit]] promote it, but his allies were complicit also.
  
'''Embraced deceit''' is common among [[liberals]], but non-existent among [[conservatives]].<ref>See a partial list of examples at [[deceit]].</ref>
+
'''Embraced deceit''' is common among [[liberals]], but non-existent among [[conservatives]].<ref>See a list of examples at [[deceit]].</ref>
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==

Revision as of 20:30, March 8, 2008

Embraced deceit is deceit that is knowingly allowed, defended or even promoted for ideological purposes. Not only did the perpetrator of the deceit promote it, but his allies were complicit also.

Embraced deceit is common among liberals, but non-existent among conservatives.[1]

References

  1. See a list of examples at deceit.