Difference between revisions of "Larry Flynt"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Larry Flynt''' is the founder of the immoral and pornographic magazine ''Hustler''.  Since founding the magazine, Flynt has become an advocate of a liberal conception of [[free speech]], under which profanity and pornography are classed as "protected speech."
+
'''Larry Flynt''' is the founder of the immoral and pornographic magazine ''Hustler''.  Since founding the magazine, Flynt has become an advocate of a liberal conception of [[free speech]], under which profanity and pornography are classed as protected speech.
  
−
Flynt acquired national status when he published a satirical article defaming, in disgusting terms, preacher [[Jerry Falwell]].  Falwell sued Flynt, but lost in the [[Supreme Court]], when the [[ACLU]] defended him.  The case was dramatized in the equally vulgar movie, ''The People v. Larry Flynt''.  Since Flynt's case, slanderous satire has been presumed acceptable as "free speech."
+
Flynt acquired national status when he published a satirical article defaming, in disgusting terms, preacher [[Jerry Falwell]].  Falwell sued Flynt, but lost in the [[Supreme Court]], when the [[ACLU]] defended him.  The case was dramatized in the 1996 film 'The People v. Larry Flynt.  Since Flynt's case, slanderous satire has been presumed acceptable as free speech.
  
 
[[category:Culture War]]
 
[[category:Culture War]]

Revision as of 04:55, March 12, 2008

Larry Flynt is the founder of the immoral and pornographic magazine Hustler. Since founding the magazine, Flynt has become an advocate of a liberal conception of free speech, under which profanity and pornography are classed as protected speech.

Flynt acquired national status when he published a satirical article defaming, in disgusting terms, preacher Jerry Falwell. Falwell sued Flynt, but lost in the Supreme Court, when the ACLU defended him. The case was dramatized in the 1996 film 'The People v. Larry Flynt. Since Flynt's case, slanderous satire has been presumed acceptable as free speech.