Difference between revisions of "Discrediting attack"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Just getting into the spirit of the place.)
m (Reverted edits by Rati0na1WikiDotCom (Talk); changed back to last version by Ed Poor)
Line 1: Line 1:
* Virtually all [[Liberals]] impugn their opponents, while depicting their own motives as pure of heart.
+
* Virtually everyone automatically impugns their opponents, while depicting their own motives as pure of heart.
 
* Journalists and other communicators often portray themselves as merely asking questions, reporting what others say or describing events, when everyone knows a verbal mugging is actually taking place.<ref>[http://www.transparencynow.com/news/disguises.htm How discrediting attacks are disguised] </ref>
 
* Journalists and other communicators often portray themselves as merely asking questions, reporting what others say or describing events, when everyone knows a verbal mugging is actually taking place.<ref>[http://www.transparencynow.com/news/disguises.htm How discrediting attacks are disguised] </ref>
  
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
[[category:journalism]]
 
[[category:journalism]]
[[Category:Politics]]
 

Revision as of 03:19, March 16, 2008

  • Virtually everyone automatically impugns their opponents, while depicting their own motives as pure of heart.
  • Journalists and other communicators often portray themselves as merely asking questions, reporting what others say or describing events, when everyone knows a verbal mugging is actually taking place.[1]

Notes