Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay:Liberal code words"
(→Why) |
(nominate for deletion) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
:Why did you create another section?! Thats exactly what I said :) [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 13:08, 18 March 2008 (EDT) | :Why did you create another section?! Thats exactly what I said :) [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 13:08, 18 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
::Hee hee we must have made them at the same time. Great minds think alike, I guess. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:09, 18 March 2008 (EDT) | ::Hee hee we must have made them at the same time. Great minds think alike, I guess. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:09, 18 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Could someone show me how to nominate an article for deletion. | ||
| + | |||
| + | OK, I have something to say so everybody listen: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <big><big><font color=red>'''You can't make up a term about liberals/atheists then write an article about it as if it were fact in an encyclopedia!''' </font> </big></big> [[User:DLerner|ד.לערנער]] 20:22, 18 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:22, March 19, 2008
And this is another example of the 'Liberal _____' articles. This one entirely inspired by a comment I left on HelpJazz's page. You don't do your website any favours by producing ridiculous articles like this all the time. Wearethefuture 11:24, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
- You should not object to articles which heap ridicule on ridiculous ideas. Rationalism seeks the truth and hopes to avoid error, doesn't it? --Ed Poor Talk 12:07, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
Have a list?
You seem to have found out our dark little secret, we have code words! Anyway I lost my decoder, you didn't happen to borrow it? ד.לערנער 12:13, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
Conservative code words
All right a bit of a parthian shot:
Here are some code words conservatives use:Liberal deceit, Liberal bias etc.
- Don't run away. Stay, and help me write Political terminology. --Ed Poor Talk 12:27, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
- not going anywhere just going to bed ד.לערנער 12:31, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
sourcing
I did a quick google books search and a google scholar search, and the reasults were not too pleasing. It appears this is not a scholarly article, and as such should be moved from the encyclopedia to the essay namespace. Bohdan 13:06, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
Why
Why why why? There's no sources, there's no attribution! I make the plea yet again to move this to the essay space. HelpJazz 13:07, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
- Why did you create another section?! Thats exactly what I said :) Bohdan 13:08, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
Could someone show me how to nominate an article for deletion.
OK, I have something to say so everybody listen:
You can't make up a term about liberals/atheists then write an article about it as if it were fact in an encyclopedia! ד.לערנער 20:22, 18 March 2008 (EDT)