Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay:Liberal code words"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(nominate for deletion)
Line 25: Line 25:
 
:Why did you create another section?!  Thats exactly what I said :) [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 13:08, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
 
:Why did you create another section?!  Thats exactly what I said :) [[User:Bohdan|Bohdan]] 13:08, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
 
::Hee hee we must have made them at the same time. Great minds think alike, I guess. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:09, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
 
::Hee hee we must have made them at the same time. Great minds think alike, I guess. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 13:09, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
Could someone show me how to nominate an article for deletion.
 +
 +
OK, I have something to say so everybody listen:
 +
 +
<big><big><font color=red>'''You can't make up a term about liberals/atheists then write an article about it as if it were fact in an encyclopedia!''' </font> </big></big> [[User:DLerner|ד.לערנער]] 20:22, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 00:22, March 19, 2008

And this is another example of the 'Liberal _____' articles. This one entirely inspired by a comment I left on HelpJazz's page. You don't do your website any favours by producing ridiculous articles like this all the time. Wearethefuture 11:24, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

You should not object to articles which heap ridicule on ridiculous ideas. Rationalism seeks the truth and hopes to avoid error, doesn't it? --Ed Poor Talk 12:07, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Have a list?

You seem to have found out our dark little secret, we have code words! Anyway I lost my decoder, you didn't happen to borrow it? ד.לערנער 12:13, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Conservative code words

All right a bit of a parthian shot:

Here are some code words conservatives use:Liberal deceit, Liberal bias etc.

Don't run away. Stay, and help me write Political terminology. --Ed Poor Talk 12:27, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
not going anywhere just going to bed ד.לערנער 12:31, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

sourcing

I did a quick google books search and a google scholar search, and the reasults were not too pleasing. It appears this is not a scholarly article, and as such should be moved from the encyclopedia to the essay namespace. Bohdan 13:06, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Why

Why why why? There's no sources, there's no attribution! I make the plea yet again to move this to the essay space. HelpJazz 13:07, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Why did you create another section?! Thats exactly what I said :) Bohdan 13:08, 18 March 2008 (EDT)
Hee hee we must have made them at the same time. Great minds think alike, I guess. HelpJazz 13:09, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Could someone show me how to nominate an article for deletion.

OK, I have something to say so everybody listen:

You can't make up a term about liberals/atheists then write an article about it as if it were fact in an encyclopedia! ד.לערנער 20:22, 18 March 2008 (EDT)