Difference between revisions of "Talk:Resurrection of Jesus Christ"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(possible biblical dispute) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Matthew 27:52, 1 Kings 17:17-22, 2 Kings 4:32-35, and 2 Kings 13:21 would seem to disagree with this, in a fairly major way. How would everyone feel about finding a better way of phrasing this, in order to convey the sense that Jesus was the first to be resurrected after death had been conquered (which is a little redundant, given that the event of conquering death '''is''' the resurrection)? | Matthew 27:52, 1 Kings 17:17-22, 2 Kings 4:32-35, and 2 Kings 13:21 would seem to disagree with this, in a fairly major way. How would everyone feel about finding a better way of phrasing this, in order to convey the sense that Jesus was the first to be resurrected after death had been conquered (which is a little redundant, given that the event of conquering death '''is''' the resurrection)? | ||
--[[User:Wikinterpreter|'''<font color="#000088">wi<font color="#220066">ki<font color="#550044">nt<font color="#770022">e<font color="#aa0000">r</font>p</font>r</font>et</font>er</font>''']] <sup>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter woo!]</sup> | --[[User:Wikinterpreter|'''<font color="#000088">wi<font color="#220066">ki<font color="#550044">nt<font color="#770022">e<font color="#aa0000">r</font>p</font>r</font>et</font>er</font>''']] <sup>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter woo!]</sup> | ||
| + | :Also, John 11:1-43. When you look for them, there are ''a lot'' of pre-Christ resurrection miracles. --[[User:Wikinterpreter|'''<font color="#000088">wi<font color="#220066">ki<font color="#550044">nt<font color="#770022">e<font color="#aa0000">r</font>p</font>r</font>et</font>er</font>''']] <sup>[http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Wikinterpreter woo!]</sup> | ||
Revision as of 18:46, March 23, 2008
'Jesus Christ was the first person to be resurrected on this earth.'
Matthew 27:52, 1 Kings 17:17-22, 2 Kings 4:32-35, and 2 Kings 13:21 would seem to disagree with this, in a fairly major way. How would everyone feel about finding a better way of phrasing this, in order to convey the sense that Jesus was the first to be resurrected after death had been conquered (which is a little redundant, given that the event of conquering death is the resurrection)? --wikinterpreter woo!
- Also, John 11:1-43. When you look for them, there are a lot of pre-Christ resurrection miracles. --wikinterpreter woo!