Difference between revisions of "Talk:Liberal redefinition"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Rainbow? I'm confused. I reiterate my request: instead of a list, could we provide some explanation? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 18:41, 24 February 2008 (EST) | :Rainbow? I'm confused. I reiterate my request: instead of a list, could we provide some explanation? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 18:41, 24 February 2008 (EST) | ||
:I second that. Without explanations, this article is meaningless.--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 00:11, 25 February 2008 (EST) | :I second that. Without explanations, this article is meaningless.--[[User:Frey|Frey]] 00:11, 25 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| − | After trudging through the liberal articles, I think the 90/10 rule should be modified to ban these ever present articles. | + | After trudging through the liberal articles, I think the 90/10 rule should be modified to ban these ever present articles. Angband 14:00, 24 March 2008 (EDT) |
=== Category === | === Category === | ||
Revision as of 18:00, March 24, 2008
Should we put a little description next to each term, so that we know how they are being redefined? HelpJazz 23:59, 20 February 2008 (EST)
- Rainbow? I'm confused. I reiterate my request: instead of a list, could we provide some explanation? HelpJazz 18:41, 24 February 2008 (EST)
- I second that. Without explanations, this article is meaningless.--Frey 00:11, 25 February 2008 (EST)
After trudging through the liberal articles, I think the 90/10 rule should be modified to ban these ever present articles. Angband 14:00, 24 March 2008 (EDT)
Category
Hey, whats wrong with Category:Liberals? Maupiti 09:38, 12 March 2008 (EDT)