Difference between revisions of "Talk:Liberals and reason"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(to HelpJazz) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:Liberals claim to exalt human reason, but all too often they do just the opposite. Don't you see that as a contradiction? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 18:16, 27 March 2008 (EDT) | :Liberals claim to exalt human reason, but all too often they do just the opposite. Don't you see that as a contradiction? --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 18:16, 27 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I see that as a contradiction, but I don't believe for one minute that all liberals are like your quote. Even so, your quotation doesn't say that liberals want to get rid of reason, it says that one radical feminist want's to look again at the ''study'' of reason. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::If we keep the article we should probably remove the link to [[ad hominem]], because the article itself is pretty close to ad hominem in itself. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 18:25, 27 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:25, March 27, 2008
Really? HelpJazz 18:13, 27 March 2008 (EDT)
- It's a deliberate strategy. See the quote I just posted about feminism opposing reason.
- Liberals claim to exalt human reason, but all too often they do just the opposite. Don't you see that as a contradiction? --Ed Poor Talk 18:16, 27 March 2008 (EDT)
- I see that as a contradiction, but I don't believe for one minute that all liberals are like your quote. Even so, your quotation doesn't say that liberals want to get rid of reason, it says that one radical feminist want's to look again at the study of reason.
- If we keep the article we should probably remove the link to ad hominem, because the article itself is pretty close to ad hominem in itself. HelpJazz 18:25, 27 March 2008 (EDT)