Difference between revisions of "Talk:Kent State protests"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: "Although the adjutant general of the Ohio National Guard said that a sniper had fired a shot, many Americans felt that there was no justification for the guardsmen to fire into the crowd ...) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"Although the adjutant general of the Ohio National Guard said that a sniper had fired a shot, many Americans felt that there was no justification for the guardsmen to fire into the crowd at all." Uh. I'm not sure what this is supposed to say... It doesn't really follow. Any suggestions for how to fix it? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 01:16, 28 March 2008 (EDT) | "Although the adjutant general of the Ohio National Guard said that a sniper had fired a shot, many Americans felt that there was no justification for the guardsmen to fire into the crowd at all." Uh. I'm not sure what this is supposed to say... It doesn't really follow. Any suggestions for how to fix it? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 01:16, 28 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I vote remove it. The first sentence is irrelevant (we already know that the ONG fired shots) and the second part is an opinion (with [[ad populum]] overtones). [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 01:19, 28 March 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 05:19, March 28, 2008
"Although the adjutant general of the Ohio National Guard said that a sniper had fired a shot, many Americans felt that there was no justification for the guardsmen to fire into the crowd at all." Uh. I'm not sure what this is supposed to say... It doesn't really follow. Any suggestions for how to fix it? Barikada 01:16, 28 March 2008 (EDT)
- I vote remove it. The first sentence is irrelevant (we already know that the ONG fired shots) and the second part is an opinion (with ad populum overtones). HelpJazz 01:19, 28 March 2008 (EDT)