Difference between revisions of "Abortion breast cancer studies"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(a start) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 13:20, March 30, 2008
Childbirth reduces a woman's risk of breast cancer, and when a pregnant woman chooses abortion instead she increases her risk. This increased risk has been proven by the vast majority of studies, many predating the politicization of abortion, and by animal studies.
Like the tobacco industry, which denied for decades that cigarettes cause lung cancer, the billion-dollar abortion industry uses several statistical tricks to deny the undeniable harm of abortion. These tricks include:
- include in the study many women who had an an abortion but are too young to develop breast cancer, which has an average age of diagnosis of 61, so that post-abortion women appear unharmed[1]
- exclude older, less politicized studies by saying that the researchers cannot be found to discuss it[2]
- downplay, and omit from the conclusion, significant medical harms found in post-abortive women[3]
- be silent when newspapers exaggerate the misreport the findings of the paper[4]
- in imitation of Hitler's attempt to discredit Einstein, invoke the power of government to deny a scientific finding[5]
References
- ↑ See, e.g., the Melbye study [1] and the Harvard Abortion Study
- ↑ See, e.g., the Beral (Lancet) analysis.
- ↑ See, e.g., the Harvard abortion study, the Melbye study, and the Beral (Lancet) analysis.
- ↑ See, e.g., the Beral (Lancet) analysis.
- ↑ http://www.conservapedia.com/National_Cancer_Institute_on_Abortion