Difference between revisions of "Abortion breast cancer studies"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(more)
(shortened first point)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
Like the tobacco industry, which denied for decades that cigarettes cause lung cancer, the billion-dollar [[abortion]] industry uses several statistical tricks to deny the undeniable harm of [[abortion]].  These tricks include:
 
Like the tobacco industry, which denied for decades that cigarettes cause lung cancer, the billion-dollar [[abortion]] industry uses several statistical tricks to deny the undeniable harm of [[abortion]].  These tricks include:
  
−
* include in the study many women who had an an [[abortion]] but are too young to develop breast cancer, which has an average age of diagnosis of 61, to deny harm to the post-abortion women<ref>See, e.g., the Melbye study [http://www.jewsforlife.org/ABCs.cfm] and the [[Harvard Abortion Study]]</ref>
+
* include in the study many women who had an an [[abortion]] but are too young to develop breast cancer, which has an average age of diagnosis of 61, to deny harm from abortion<ref>See, e.g., the Melbye study [http://www.jewsforlife.org/ABCs.cfm] and the [[Harvard Abortion Study]]</ref>
 
* exclude older, less politicized studies by saying that the researchers cannot be found to discuss it<ref>See, e.g., the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref>
 
* exclude older, less politicized studies by saying that the researchers cannot be found to discuss it<ref>See, e.g., the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref>
 
* downplay, and omit from the conclusion, significant medical harms found in post-abortive women<ref>See, e.g., the [[Harvard abortion study]], the Melbye study, and the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref>
 
* downplay, and omit from the conclusion, significant medical harms found in post-abortive women<ref>See, e.g., the [[Harvard abortion study]], the Melbye study, and the Beral (Lancet) analysis.</ref>

Revision as of 13:24, March 30, 2008

Childbirth reduces a woman's risk of breast cancer, and when a pregnant woman chooses abortion instead she increases her risk. This increased risk has been proven by the vast majority of studies, many predating the politicization of abortion, and by animal studies.

Like the tobacco industry, which denied for decades that cigarettes cause lung cancer, the billion-dollar abortion industry uses several statistical tricks to deny the undeniable harm of abortion. These tricks include:

  • include in the study many women who had an an abortion but are too young to develop breast cancer, which has an average age of diagnosis of 61, to deny harm from abortion[1]
  • exclude older, less politicized studies by saying that the researchers cannot be found to discuss it[2]
  • downplay, and omit from the conclusion, significant medical harms found in post-abortive women[3]
  • be silent when newspapers exaggerate the misreport the findings of the paper[4]
  • in imitation of Hitler's attempt to discredit Einstein,[5] invoke the power of government to deny a scientific finding[6]
  • use a demographic that is not typical of post-abortion women, and conceal that from the reported results[7]

References

  1. ↑ See, e.g., the Melbye study [1] and the Harvard Abortion Study
  2. ↑ See, e.g., the Beral (Lancet) analysis.
  3. ↑ See, e.g., the Harvard abortion study, the Melbye study, and the Beral (Lancet) analysis.
  4. ↑ See, e.g., the Beral (Lancet) analysis.
  5. ↑ http://www.jpands.org/vol13no1/lanfranchi.pdf
  6. ↑ http://www.conservapedia.com/National_Cancer_Institute_on_Abortion
  7. ↑ See, e.g., Harvard abortion study
Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Abortion_breast_cancer_studies&oldid=417201"