Difference between revisions of "Talk:Final Fantasy"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(duty and obedience to the law are bad things)
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
*One objection to this game is an underlying message that duty and obedience to the law are bad things. [http://christiananswers.net/spotlight/games/2001/finalfantasy9.html]
 
*One objection to this game is an underlying message that duty and obedience to the law are bad things. [http://christiananswers.net/spotlight/games/2001/finalfantasy9.html]
 +
 +
 +
Yes, I'm second to that, but we should add warning like:"this game might contain the word of magic or info of witchcraft". And thanks info about FF9, it brought good times. --[[User:TagoPagdaluhong|TagoPagdaluhong]] 09:08, 4 April 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 13:08, April 4, 2008

Why was this page deleted Eljawa 09:26, 25 July 2007 (EDT)

It might be possible to start over with a God-centered critique, similar to what we have done with Grand Theft Auto. --Ed Poor Talk 08:41, 4 April 2008 (EDT)
  • One objection to this game is an underlying message that duty and obedience to the law are bad things. [1]


Yes, I'm second to that, but we should add warning like:"this game might contain the word of magic or info of witchcraft". And thanks info about FF9, it brought good times. --TagoPagdaluhong 09:08, 4 April 2008 (EDT)