Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bundren v. Parriott"
From Conservapedia
(Subcategory) |
(→Subcategory: reply) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Andy, Do you really want this article to be in both categories: Circuit Cases and Tenth Circuit? Shouldn't it just be in the subcategory (Tenth Circuit)? | Andy, Do you really want this article to be in both categories: Circuit Cases and Tenth Circuit? Shouldn't it just be in the subcategory (Tenth Circuit)? | ||
If you agree, I can fix the categories on the other Circuit Cases articles. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 13:37, 12 April 2008 (EDT) | If you agree, I can fix the categories on the other Circuit Cases articles. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 13:37, 12 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I think we do want both, because "Circuit Cases" is much broader than "Tenth Circuit" and it is helpful to be able trace both categories easily and independently, without sub-nesting.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:00, 12 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 18:00, April 12, 2008
Subcategory
Andy, Do you really want this article to be in both categories: Circuit Cases and Tenth Circuit? Shouldn't it just be in the subcategory (Tenth Circuit)? If you agree, I can fix the categories on the other Circuit Cases articles. --Crocoite 13:37, 12 April 2008 (EDT)
- I think we do want both, because "Circuit Cases" is much broader than "Tenth Circuit" and it is helpful to be able trace both categories easily and independently, without sub-nesting.--Aschlafly 14:00, 12 April 2008 (EDT)
