Difference between revisions of "Gordon v. Lewistown Hospital"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: In ''Gordon v. Lewistown Hospital'', 423 F.3d 184, 201 (3d Cir. 2005), the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld a trial court's ruling that the defendant hospital had immunity...)
 
m (cat)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
The decision was rendered by Judge [[D. Michael Fisher]].  Then-Judge [[Samuel Alito]] joined his decision, as did Judge [[Thomas L. Ambro]].
 
The decision was rendered by Judge [[D. Michael Fisher]].  Then-Judge [[Samuel Alito]] joined his decision, as did Judge [[Thomas L. Ambro]].
 
[[category:Circuit Cases]]
 
[[category:Circuit Cases]]
 +
[[category:Third Circuit]]
 
[[category:peer review]]
 
[[category:peer review]]

Revision as of 18:48, April 12, 2008

In Gordon v. Lewistown Hospital, 423 F.3d 184, 201 (3d Cir. 2005), the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit upheld a trial court's ruling that the defendant hospital had immunity from damages for suspending and then revoking a physician's medical-dental staff privileges, because this adverse peer review met the definition of professional review under HCQIA.

The decision was rendered by Judge D. Michael Fisher. Then-Judge Samuel Alito joined his decision, as did Judge Thomas L. Ambro.