Difference between revisions of "User talk:MilesM"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(meh) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
==Advice to prevent you from being blocked== | ==Advice to prevent you from being blocked== | ||
Generally when a word is blocked by a spam filter, it is blocked for a reason. As such, it is considered unacceptable to go around posting it. Thanks, [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 20:14, 13 April 2008 (EDT) | Generally when a word is blocked by a spam filter, it is blocked for a reason. As such, it is considered unacceptable to go around posting it. Thanks, [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 20:14, 13 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I allso visited the site not to be named, and i have to say, im bit puzzled. Yes, it's critical towards CP but does completely censoring it and not even allowing naming the site really do any good for CP? Conservapedia is extremely critical towards Wikipedia, does Wikipedia censor CP and filter it's name? No, they even have an article about CP. If anything, this censoring only makes me thing that they might be right about this site. [[User:Adamy|Adamy]] 20:41, 13 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:41, April 14, 2008
Query - Roderick Miller
Do you know anything about Roderick Miller? -- 
11:06, 13 April 2008 (EDT)
- No, not really. Why? --MilesM 11:08, 13 April 2008 (EDT)
I show you editing many famous american articles and thought you might know something about American history, the article was copied from wikipedia and thus needs to be deleted, I am going to contact Andy about it, I was hoping you could rewrite it -- 11:21, 13 April 2008 (EDT)
- I just added categories to those biographies, not much in terms of content. :) --MilesM 11:23, 13 April 2008 (EDT)
Advice to prevent you from being blocked
Generally when a word is blocked by a spam filter, it is blocked for a reason. As such, it is considered unacceptable to go around posting it. Thanks, HenryS 20:14, 13 April 2008 (EDT)
- I allso visited the site not to be named, and i have to say, im bit puzzled. Yes, it's critical towards CP but does completely censoring it and not even allowing naming the site really do any good for CP? Conservapedia is extremely critical towards Wikipedia, does Wikipedia censor CP and filter it's name? No, they even have an article about CP. If anything, this censoring only makes me thing that they might be right about this site. Adamy 20:41, 13 April 2008 (EDT)